Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Chutes vs SiliconFlow: LLM provider comparison

Compare Chutes and SiliconFlow on 7 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Chutes

8 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
8 text

SiliconFlow

36 indexed models

Headquarters
Singapore
Server regions
United States
Model types
35 text, 1 embeddings

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.19× typical advantage

7 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.0429 / 1M

7 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

36 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricChutesSiliconFlow
Typical 500-token response31.19 s28.31 s
Typical response start2.91 s2.29 s
Typical output speed25.0 tok/s19.0 tok/s
Blended token price$1.0429 / 1M$1.1867 / 1M
Typical route uptime91.79%83.18%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

ChutesSiliconFlow
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Chutes has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 7 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Chutes has the lower typical price ratio across 7 priced shared models.

Shared text models

7 exact models · newest first

ModelChutesSiliconFlow
Qwen3.6 27BWinner · Chutes

qwen/qwen3.6-27b

Chutes
Blended price
$0.8667 / 1M
500-token response
46.78 s
Response starts
1.32 s
Output speed
11.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.50%
Context
262.1K
Route
chutes/fp8
SiliconFlow
Blended price
$1.2667 / 1M
500-token response
64.25 s
Response starts
1.75 s
Output speed
8.0 tok/s
Route uptime
83.18%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Kimi K2.6Winner · Chutes

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

Chutes
Blended price
$1.6067 / 1M
500-token response
31.19 s
Response starts
4.88 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.67%
Context
262.1K
Route
chutes/int4
SiliconFlow
Blended price
$1.6467 / 1M
500-token response
37.63 s
Response starts
4.29 s
Output speed
15.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.23%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
GLM 5.1Winner · SiliconFlow

z-ai/glm-5.1

Chutes
Blended price
$1.68 / 1M
500-token response
38.05 s
Response starts
18.05 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
63.57%
Context
202.8K
Route
chutes/fp8
SiliconFlow
Blended price
$2.04 / 1M
500-token response
14.79 s
Response starts
2.29 s
Output speed
40.0 tok/s
Route uptime
62.07%
Context
204.8K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Gemma 4 31BWinner · Chutes

google/gemma-4-31b-it

Chutes
Blended price
$0.2033 / 1M
500-token response
52.91 s
Response starts
2.91 s
Output speed
10.0 tok/s
Route uptime
57.68%
Context
131.1K
Route
chutes/fp4
SiliconFlow
Blended price
$0.22 / 1M
500-token response
54.85 s
Response starts
13.19 s
Output speed
12.0 tok/s
Route uptime
40.07%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
MiniMax M2.5Winner · Chutes

minimax/minimax-m2.5

Chutes
Blended price
$0.5 / 1M
500-token response
14.83 s
Response starts
1.68 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
83.43%
Context
196.6K
Route
chutes/fp8
SiliconFlow
Blended price
$0.6 / 1M
500-token response
15.44 s
Response starts
1.55 s
Output speed
36.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
196.6K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
GLM 5Winner · Chutes

z-ai/glm-5

Chutes
Blended price
$1.4833 / 1M
500-token response
22.84 s
Response starts
4.32 s
Output speed
27.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
202.8K
Route
chutes/fp8
SiliconFlow
Blended price
$1.4833 / 1M
500-token response
27.28 s
Response starts
3.48 s
Output speed
21.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.94%
Context
204.8K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Kimi K2.5Winner · Chutes

moonshotai/kimi-k2.5

Chutes
Blended price
$0.96 / 1M
500-token response
21.33 s
Response starts
1.33 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
91.79%
Context
262.1K
Route
chutes/int4
SiliconFlow
Blended price
$1.05 / 1M
500-token response
28.31 s
Response starts
1.99 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.21%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/int4

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Chutes vs SiliconFlow analysis

How Chutes and SiliconFlow compare for AI inference

Chutes and SiliconFlow share 7 indexed text models, including Qwen3.6 27B, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.1, Gemma 4 31B, MiniMax M2.5. Chutes has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

7 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

7 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Chutes has 8 indexed models and lists no published server regions; SiliconFlow has 36 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Chutes and SiliconFlow.