Cloudflare vs CoreWeave: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CCoreWeave

1.49× typical advantage

6 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

CCoreWeave

$1.2394 / 1M

6 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

CCoreWeave

20 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCloudflare☆☆☆☆☆(0)	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Cloudflare14.27 s	CoreWeave12.31 s
TTFT	Cloudflare0.88 s	CoreWeave0.47 s
TPS	Cloudflare37.5 tok/s	CoreWeave52.5 tok/s
Uptime	Cloudflare100.00%	CoreWeave99.98%
Blended	Cloudflare$1.2772 / 1M	CoreWeave$1.2394 / 1M

Model	CCloudflare☆☆☆☆☆(0)	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)
ZA GLM 5.2Winner · Cloudflare	Cloudflare Speed— Best comparable value 7.64 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 80.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route cloudflare Blended— Worst comparable value $2.4 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 20.46 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.94 s TPS— Worst comparable value 27.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.96% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Best comparable value $2.3933 / 1M
M Kimi K2.7 CodeWinner · CoreWeave	Cloudflare Speed— Worst comparable value 11.82 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.18 s TPS— Worst comparable value 47.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route cloudflare Blended— Worst comparable value $1.9667 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 7.35 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.68 s TPS— Best comparable value 75.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/int4 Blended— Best comparable value $1.96 / 1M
D DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Cloudflare	Cloudflare Speed— Best comparable value 15.15 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.87 s TPS— Best comparable value 35.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 384K Route cloudflare Blended $0.1867 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 17.27 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.60 s TPS— Worst comparable value 30.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.85% Context 1M Route coreweave/fp8 Blended $0.1867 / 1M
M Kimi K2.6Winner · CoreWeave	Cloudflare Speed— Worst comparable value 13.39 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.89 s TPS— Worst comparable value 40.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route cloudflare Blended $1.9667 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 3.30 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.34 s TPS— Best comparable value 169.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.89% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended $1.9667 / 1M
ML Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · CoreWeave	Cloudflare Speed— Worst comparable value 24.53 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.72 s TPS— Worst comparable value 21.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.27% Context 24K Route cloudflare/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.9463 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 18.01 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.15 s TPS— Best comparable value 28.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 128K Route coreweave/fp16 Blended— Best comparable value $0.71 / 1M
ML Llama 3.1 8B InstructWinner · CoreWeave	Cloudflare Speed— Worst comparable value 33.80 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.46 s TPS— Worst comparable value 15.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 32K Route cloudflare/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.197 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 4.63 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.17 s TPS— Best comparable value 112.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 128K Route coreweave/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.22 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.