CoreWeave vs GMICloud: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

GGMICloud

1.28× typical advantage

4 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

GGMICloud

$1.0749 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

CCoreWeave

20 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)	GGMICloud☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	CoreWeave18.86 s	GMICloud13.67 s
TTFT	CoreWeave1.05 s	GMICloud2.28 s
TPS	CoreWeave28.5 tok/s	GMICloud44.0 tok/s
Uptime	CoreWeave99.90%	GMICloud98.98%
Blended	CoreWeave$1.825 / 1M	GMICloud$1.0749 / 1M

Model	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)	GGMICloud☆☆☆☆☆(0)
ZA GLM 5.2Winner · GMICloud	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 20.46 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.94 s TPS— Worst comparable value 27.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.96% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.3933 / 1M	GMICloud Speed— Best comparable value 17.10 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.95 s TPS— Best comparable value 33.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 98.22% Context 1M Route gmicloud/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $1.584 / 1M
D DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · GMICloud	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 64.00 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.50 s TPS— Worst comparable value 8.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 98.59% Context 1M Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.32 / 1M	GMICloud Speed— Best comparable value 14.64 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 3.01 s TPS— Best comparable value 43.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 98.85% Context 1M Route gmicloud/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.9048 / 1M
D DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · GMICloud	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 17.27 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.60 s TPS— Worst comparable value 30.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.85% Context 1M Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.1867 / 1M	GMICloud Speed— Best comparable value 12.69 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.58 s TPS— Best comparable value 45.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.96% Context 1M Route gmicloud/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.1307 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 4.38 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.50 s TPS— Best comparable value 129.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 202.8K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.4 / 1M	GMICloud Speed— Worst comparable value 9.65 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.61 s TPS— Worst comparable value 71.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.10% Context 202.8K Route gmicloud/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $1.68 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.