CoreWeave vs Inceptron: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CCoreWeave

2.18× typical advantage

4 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

IInceptron

$1.3042 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

CCoreWeave

20 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)	IInceptron☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	CoreWeave6.95 s	Inceptron15.45 s
TTFT	CoreWeave0.53 s	Inceptron0.76 s
TPS	CoreWeave78.0 tok/s	Inceptron34.5 tok/s
Uptime	CoreWeave99.98%	Inceptron99.89%
Blended	CoreWeave$1.73 / 1M	Inceptron$1.3042 / 1M

Model	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)	IInceptron☆☆☆☆☆(0)
ZA GLM 5.2Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 20.46 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.94 s TPS— Best comparable value 27.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.96% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.3933 / 1M	Inceptron Speed— Worst comparable value 47.06 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.60 s TPS— Worst comparable value 11.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 77.48% Context 1M Route inceptron/fp4 Blended— Best comparable value $1.5933 / 1M
M Kimi K2.7 CodeWinner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 7.35 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.68 s TPS— Best comparable value 75.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/int4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.96 / 1M	Inceptron Speed— Worst comparable value 9.92 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.74 s TPS— Worst comparable value 54.5 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route inceptron/int4 Blended— Best comparable value $1.6467 / 1M
M Kimi K2.6Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 3.30 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.34 s TPS— Best comparable value 169.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.89% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.9667 / 1M	Inceptron Speed— Worst comparable value 17.30 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.64 s TPS— Worst comparable value 30.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.85% Context 262.1K Route inceptron/int4 Blended— Best comparable value $1.5767 / 1M
M MiniMax M2.5Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 6.55 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.38 s TPS— Best comparable value 81.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 196.6K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.6 / 1M	Inceptron Speed— Worst comparable value 13.59 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.77 s TPS— Worst comparable value 39.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.94% Context 196.6K Route inceptron/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.4 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.