Crusoe vs NovitaAI: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CCrusoe

1.23× typical advantage

6 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

NNovitaAI

$0.7729 / 1M

7 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

NNovitaAI

67 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	NNovitaAI☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Crusoe15.82 s	NovitaAI18.50 s
TTFT	Crusoe0.55 s	NovitaAI1.27 s
TPS	Crusoe33.0 tok/s	NovitaAI29.0 tok/s
Uptime	Crusoe99.56%	NovitaAI94.16%
Blended	Crusoe$0.8414 / 1M	NovitaAI$0.7729 / 1M

Model	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	NNovitaAI☆☆☆☆☆(0)
M Kimi K2.6Winner · NovitaAI	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 34.64 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.31 s TPS— Worst comparable value 15.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 56.00% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $1.6333 / 1M	NovitaAI Speed— Best comparable value 18.58 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.34 s TPS— Best comparable value 29.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.28% Context 262.1K Route novita Blended— Worst comparable value $1.6667 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 5.89 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 91.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 202.8K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.2667 / 1M	NovitaAI Speed— Worst comparable value 12.93 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.06 s TPS— Worst comparable value 46.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.74% Context 204.8K Route novita/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.3867 / 1M
G Gemma 4 31BWinner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 84.17 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.83 s TPS— Best comparable value 6.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 91.12% Context 262.1K Route crusoe Blended $0.2267 / 1M	NovitaAI Speed— Worst comparable value 252.81 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.81 s TPS— Worst comparable value 2.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 68.44% Context 262.1K Route novita/bf16 Blended $0.2267 / 1M
N Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B	Crusoe Speed N/a TTFT N/a TPS N/a Uptime 0.00% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended $0.1 / 1M	NovitaAI Speed N/a TTFT N/a TPS N/a Uptime N/a Context 262.1K Route novita/fp4 Blended $0.1 / 1M
Q Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner · NovitaAI	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 11.96 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.33 s TPS— Best comparable value 43.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.58% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4133 / 1M	NovitaAI Speed— Worst comparable value 14.24 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.72 s TPS— Worst comparable value 37.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 96.79% Context 131.1K Route novita/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.2533 / 1M
D DeepSeek V3 0324Winner · NovitaAI	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 17.05 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 30.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.55% Context 163.8K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.8333 / 1M	NovitaAI Speed— Worst comparable value 18.45 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.21 s TPS— Worst comparable value 29.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 91.52% Context 163.8K Route novita/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.5533 / 1M
ML Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · NovitaAI	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 14.59 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.70 s TPS— Best comparable value 36.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.91% Context 131.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4167 / 1M	NovitaAI Speed— Worst comparable value 18.54 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.69 s TPS— Worst comparable value 28.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 31.79% Context 6K Route novita/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $0.2233 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.