Crusoe vs SiliconFlow: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CCrusoe

1.65× typical advantage

4 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

SSiliconFlow

$1.1017 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

SSiliconFlow

36 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	SSiliconFlow☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Crusoe25.85 s	SiliconFlow24.17 s
TTFT	Crusoe0.61 s	SiliconFlow1.60 s
TPS	Crusoe22.5 tok/s	SiliconFlow26.0 tok/s
Uptime	Crusoe95.33%	SiliconFlow98.69%
Blended	Crusoe$1.24 / 1M	SiliconFlow$1.1017 / 1M

Model	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	SSiliconFlow☆☆☆☆☆(0)
M Kimi K2.6Winner · SiliconFlow	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 34.64 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.31 s TPS— Worst comparable value 15.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 56.00% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $1.6333 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Best comparable value 15.70 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.81 s TPS— Best comparable value 36.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.6467 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 5.89 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 91.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 202.8K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.2667 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 10.65 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.22 s TPS— Worst comparable value 53.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.79% Context 204.8K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.04 / 1M
G Gemma 4 31BWinner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 84.17 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.83 s TPS— Best comparable value 6.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 91.12% Context 262.1K Route crusoe Blended— Worst comparable value $0.2267 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 127.75 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.75 s TPS— Worst comparable value 4.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 22.68% Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.22 / 1M
D DeepSeek V3 0324Winner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 17.05 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 30.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.55% Context 163.8K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.8333 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 32.65 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.40 s TPS— Worst comparable value 16.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 97.59% Context 163.8K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.5 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.