Crusoe vs Venice: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

VVenice

1.67× typical advantage

4 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

CCrusoe

$1.135 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

VVenice

30 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	VVenice☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Crusoe23.30 s	Venice18.65 s
TTFT	Crusoe0.61 s	Venice1.04 s
TPS	Crusoe29.0 tok/s	Venice31.0 tok/s
Uptime	Crusoe95.35%	Venice99.34%
Blended	Crusoe$1.135 / 1M	Venice$1.2142 / 1M

Model	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	VVenice☆☆☆☆☆(0)
M Kimi K2.6Winner · Venice	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 34.64 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.31 s TPS— Worst comparable value 15.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 56.00% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $1.6333 / 1M	Venice Speed— Best comparable value 13.48 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.98 s TPS— Best comparable value 40.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 256K Route venice/int4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.6667 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 5.89 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 91.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 202.8K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.2667 / 1M	Venice Speed— Worst comparable value 7.55 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.30 s TPS— Worst comparable value 80.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 200K Route venice/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.64 / 1M
G Gemma 4 31BWinner · Venice	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 84.17 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.83 s TPS— Worst comparable value 6.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 91.12% Context 262.1K Route crusoe Blended— Worst comparable value $0.2267 / 1M	Venice Speed— Best comparable value 23.82 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.10 s TPS— Best comparable value 22.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 98.68% Context 256K Route venice/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $0.2 / 1M
Q Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 11.96 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.33 s TPS— Best comparable value 43.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.58% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4133 / 1M	Venice Speed— Worst comparable value 28.42 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.64 s TPS— Worst comparable value 18.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 96.45% Context 128K Route venice/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.35 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.