Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

DeepInfra vs Ionstream: LLM provider comparison

Compare DeepInfra and Ionstream on 4 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

DeepInfra

85 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
65 text, 15 embeddings, 5 speech

Ionstream

5 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
5 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.71× typical advantage

4 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.9083 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

85 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricDeepInfra(0)Ionstream(0)
SpeedDeepInfra19.50 sIonstream38.77 s
TTFTDeepInfra0.91 sIonstream1.53 s
TPSDeepInfra28.0 tok/sIonstream13.5 tok/s
UptimeDeepInfra99.63%Ionstream91.56%
BlendedDeepInfra$0.9083 / 1MIonstream$1.0787 / 1M
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

DeepInfraIonstream
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

DeepInfra has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 4 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

DeepInfra has the lower typical price ratio across 4 priced shared models.

Shared text models

4 exact models · newest first

ModelDeepInfra(0)Ionstream(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · DeepInfra
DeepInfra
Speed— Worst comparable value
17.86 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.73 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
31.0 tok/s
Uptime
98.33%
Context
1M
Route
deepinfra/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$1.62 / 1M
Ionstream
Speed— Best comparable value
12.96 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.33 s
TPS— Best comparable value
43.0 tok/s
Uptime
N/a
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.4 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · DeepInfra
DeepInfra
Speed— Best comparable value
10.90 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.69 s
TPS— Best comparable value
49.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.63%
Context
1M
Route
deepinfra/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$1.7333 / 1M
Ionstream
Speed— Worst comparable value
43.38 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.72 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
12.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
91.56%
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$1.508 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · DeepInfra
DeepInfra
Speed— Best comparable value
21.14 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.14 s
TPS— Best comparable value
25.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
98.83%
Context
1M
Route
deepinfra/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.12 / 1M
Ionstream
Speed— Worst comparable value
46.17 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
4.50 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
12.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
98.38%
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.1867 / 1M
Gemma 4 26B A4BWinner · DeepInfra
DeepInfra
Speed— Best comparable value
24.32 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.51 s
TPS— Best comparable value
21.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.92%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.16 / 1M
Ionstream
Speed— Worst comparable value
34.17 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
0.83 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
15.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
82.59%
Context
262.1K
Route
ionstream/bf16
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.22 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

DeepInfra vs Ionstream analysis

How DeepInfra and Ionstream compare for AI inference

DeepInfra and Ionstream share 4 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Gemma 4 26B A4B. DeepInfra has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

4 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

4 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

DeepInfra has 85 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Ionstream has 5 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.