Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

GMICloud vs io.net: LLM provider comparison

Compare GMICloud and io.net on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

GMICloud

13 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
13 text

io.net

5 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
5 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.01× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.6195 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

13 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricGMICloud(0)io.net(0)
SpeedGMICloud18.34 sio.net19.27 s
TTFTGMICloud2.29 sio.net1.88 s
TPSGMICloud35.0 tok/sio.net30.0 tok/s
UptimeGMICloud94.40%io.net99.96%
BlendedGMICloud$0.6195 / 1Mio.net$1.5441 / 1M
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

GMICloudio.net
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

io.net has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

GMICloud has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

ModelGMICloud(0)io.net(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · GMICloud
GMICloud
Speed— Worst comparable value
19.53 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
2.29 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
29.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
94.40%
Context
1M
Route
gmicloud/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$1.584 / 1M
io.net
Speed— Best comparable value
19.27 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.60 s
TPS— Best comparable value
30.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$4.2229 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · GMICloud
GMICloud
Speed— Best comparable value
16.51 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.23 s
TPS— Best comparable value
35.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
98.72%
Context
1M
Route
gmicloud/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.1251 / 1M
io.net
Speed— Worst comparable value
85.22 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.88 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
6.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.96%
Context
32.8K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.1853 / 1M
MiMo-V2.5Winner · io.net
GMICloud
Speed— Worst comparable value
18.34 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
4.06 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
35.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
79.39%
Context
1.1M
Route
gmicloud/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.1493 / 1M
io.net
Speed— Best comparable value
10.88 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.08 s
TPS— Best comparable value
51.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
98.72%
Context
262.1K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.224 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

GMICloud vs io.net analysis

How GMICloud and io.net compare for AI inference

GMICloud and io.net share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiMo-V2.5. io.net has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

GMICloud has 13 indexed models and lists 1 published server region; io.net has 5 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both GMICloud and io.net.