GMICloud vs Wafer: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

GGMICloud

1.26× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

GGMICloud

$1.3896 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

GGMICloud

13 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	GGMICloud☆☆☆☆☆(0)	WWafer☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	GMICloud11.74 s	Wafer14.75 s
TTFT	GMICloud2.59 s	Wafer4.95 s
TPS	GMICloud55.0 tok/s	Wafer53.0 tok/s
Uptime	GMICloud99.06%	Wafer100.00%
Blended	GMICloud$1.3896 / 1M	Wafer$1.9111 / 1M

Model	GGMICloud☆☆☆☆☆(0)	WWafer☆☆☆☆☆(0)
ZA GLM 5.2Winner · GMICloud	GMICloud Speed— Worst comparable value 12.48 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.48 s TPS— Worst comparable value 50.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.06% Context 1M Route gmicloud/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $1.584 / 1M	Wafer Speed— Best comparable value 9.16 s TTFT— Best comparable value 2.41 s TPS— Best comparable value 74.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 1M Route wafer/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.4 / 1M
D DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · GMICloud	GMICloud Speed— Best comparable value 11.68 s TTFT— Best comparable value 2.59 s TPS— Best comparable value 55.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.74% Context 1M Route gmicloud/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.9048 / 1M	Wafer Speed— Worst comparable value 14.75 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 4.95 s TPS— Worst comparable value 51.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.28% Context 1M Route wafer/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.6 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · GMICloud	GMICloud Speed— Best comparable value 11.74 s TTFT— Best comparable value 3.12 s TPS— Best comparable value 58.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 98.48% Context 202.8K Route gmicloud/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $1.68 / 1M	Wafer Speed— Worst comparable value 15.15 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 5.71 s TPS— Worst comparable value 53.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 202.8K Route wafer/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.7333 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 25, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.