Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

io.net vs Phala: LLM provider comparison

Compare io.net and Phala on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

io.net

5 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
5 text

Phala

19 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
19 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.09× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.3567 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

19 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metricio.net(0)Phala(0)
Speedio.net14.52 sPhala18.66 s
TTFTio.net0.67 sPhala1.42 s
TPSio.net43.0 tok/sPhala29.0 tok/s
Uptimeio.net100.00%Phala98.75%
Blendedio.net$2.021 / 1MPhala$1.3567 / 1M
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

io.netPhala
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Phala has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Phala has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

Modelio.net(0)Phala(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · Phala
io.net
Speed— Worst comparable value
14.52 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.89 s
TPS— Best comparable value
43.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$4.2229 / 1M
Phala
Speed— Best comparable value
13.36 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.46 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
42.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
98.75%
Context
1M
Route
phala
Blended— Best comparable value
$2.4 / 1M
Qwen3.6 35B A3BWinner · io.net
io.net
Speed— Best comparable value
4.42 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.67 s
TPS— Best comparable value
133.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.99 / 1M
Phala
Speed— Worst comparable value
18.66 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.42 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
29.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
99.94%
Context
262.1K
Route
phala
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.5567 / 1M
Qwen3.6 27BWinner · io.net
io.net
Speed— Worst comparable value
24.35 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.54 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
21.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
32.8K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.85 / 1M
Phala
Speed— Best comparable value
19.62 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.10 s
TPS— Best comparable value
27.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
97.97%
Context
262.1K
Route
phala
Blended— Worst comparable value
$1.1133 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

io.net vs Phala analysis

How io.net and Phala compare for AI inference

io.net and Phala share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, Qwen3.6 35B A3B, Qwen3.6 27B. Phala has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

io.net has 5 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Phala has 19 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both io.net and Phala.