Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Morph vs Phala: LLM provider comparison

Compare Morph and Phala on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Morph

8 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
8 text

Phala

18 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
18 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.30× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.1064 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

18 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricMorph(0)Phala(0)
SpeedMorph46.97 sPhala48.86 s
TTFTMorph1.51 sPhala3.40 s
TPSMorph11.0 tok/sPhala11.0 tok/s
UptimeMorph97.70%Phala91.98%
BlendedMorph$1.1064 / 1MPhala$1.2556 / 1M
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

MorphPhala
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Morph has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Morph has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

ModelMorph(0)Phala(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · Morph
Morph
Speed— Best comparable value
11.46 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.25 s
TPS— Best comparable value
49.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
98.75%
Context
1M
Route
morph
Blended— Best comparable value
$2.1 / 1M
Phala
Speed— Worst comparable value
27.46 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.46 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
20.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
94.88%
Context
1M
Route
phala
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.4 / 1M
Qwen3.6 27BWinner · Morph
Morph
Speed— Best comparable value
46.97 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.51 s
TPS— Best comparable value
11.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
1.02%
Context
131.1K
Route
morph
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.9927 / 1M
Phala
Speed— Worst comparable value
61.01 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
5.46 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
9.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
91.98%
Context
262.1K
Route
phala
Blended— Worst comparable value
$1.1133 / 1M
Gemma 4 31BWinner · Phala
Morph
Speed— Worst comparable value
102.35 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
2.35 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
5.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
97.70%
Context
175K
Route
morph/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.2267 / 1M
Phala
Speed— Best comparable value
48.86 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
3.40 s
TPS— Best comparable value
11.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
80.67%
Context
262.1K
Route
phala
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.2533 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Morph vs Phala analysis

How Morph and Phala compare for AI inference

Morph and Phala share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, Qwen3.6 27B, Gemma 4 31B. Morph has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Morph has 8 indexed models and lists 1 published server region; Phala has 18 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Morph and Phala.