Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Nebius vs NovitaAI: LLM provider comparison

Compare Nebius and NovitaAI on 6 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Nebius

13 indexed models

Headquarters
Netherlands
Server regions
N/a
Model types
12 text, 1 embeddings

NovitaAI

66 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
66 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.07× typical advantage

6 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.5377 / 1M

6 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

66 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricNebiusNovitaAI
Typical 500-token response17.48 s17.72 s
Typical response start0.59 s0.75 s
Typical output speed31.0 tok/s30.0 tok/s
Blended token price$0.59 / 1M$0.5377 / 1M
Typical route uptime96.95%94.41%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

NebiusNovitaAI
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

NovitaAI has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 6 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

NovitaAI has the lower typical price ratio across 6 priced shared models.

Shared text models

6 exact models · newest first

ModelNebiusNovitaAI
GLM 5.1Winner · NovitaAI

z-ai/glm-5.1

Nebius
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
28.52 s
Response starts
0.74 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
67.68%
Context
202.8K
Route
nebius/fp8
NovitaAI
Blended price
$2.3867 / 1M
500-token response
22.62 s
Response starts
2.62 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
67.25%
Context
204.8K
Route
novita/fp8
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWinner · NovitaAI

nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b

Nebius
Blended price
$0.12 / 1M
500-token response
12.83 s
Response starts
0.33 s
Output speed
40.0 tok/s
Route uptime
96.57%
Context
262.1K
Route
nebius/fp8
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.1 / 1M
500-token response
7.50 s
Response starts
0.65 s
Output speed
73.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
novita/fp4
gpt-oss-120bWinner · NovitaAI

openai/gpt-oss-120b

Nebius
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
6.62 s
Response starts
0.67 s
Output speed
84.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.33%
Context
131.1K
Route
nebius/fp4
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.1167 / 1M
500-token response
9.33 s
Response starts
0.71 s
Output speed
58.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.36%
Context
131.1K
Route
novita/fp4

qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507

Nebius
Blended price
$0.3333 / 1M
500-token response
13.68 s
Response starts
0.52 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.77%
Context
262.1K
Route
nebius/fp8
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.2533 / 1M
500-token response
19.95 s
Response starts
0.72 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.83%
Context
131.1K
Route
novita/fp8
Gemma 3 27BWinner · NovitaAI

google/gemma-3-27b-it

Nebius
Blended price
$0.1667 / 1M
500-token response
28.44 s
Response starts
0.66 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
93.99%
Context
110K
Route
nebius/fp8
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.146 / 1M
500-token response
32.31 s
Response starts
1.06 s
Output speed
16.0 tok/s
Route uptime
78.65%
Context
98.3K
Route
novita/bf16
Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · NovitaAI

meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct

Nebius
Blended price
$0.22 / 1M
500-token response
21.28 s
Response starts
0.45 s
Output speed
24.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.93%
Context
131.1K
Route
nebius/fp8
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.2233 / 1M
500-token response
15.48 s
Response starts
0.78 s
Output speed
34.0 tok/s
Route uptime
90.47%
Context
6K
Route
novita/bf16

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Nebius vs NovitaAI analysis

How Nebius and NovitaAI compare for AI inference

Nebius and NovitaAI share 6 indexed text models, including GLM 5.1, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-120b, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, Gemma 3 27B. NovitaAI has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

6 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

6 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Nebius has 13 indexed models and lists no published server regions; NovitaAI has 66 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Nebius and NovitaAI.