Skip to content

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 provider comparison

poolside/laguna-s-2.1

Laguna S 2.1 is the latest coding agent model from [Poolside](<https://poolside.ai/>). Laguna S 2.1 is a 118B total parameter model with 8B active parameters, scoring 70.2% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and...

Endpoints:
1
Context:
1M
Input:
text
Output:
text
Compare this model in a set →

At a glance

Comparison winners

Based on 1,000 input and 500 output tokens using the latest published median speed data.

Best cost/speed trade-off

Poolsidepoolside/bf16

$0.1333 / 1M tokens

7.55 s estimated response

Cheapest

Poolsidepoolside/bf16

$0.1333 / 1M tokens

$0.0002 for the sample request

Fastest

Poolsidepoolside/bf16

7.55 s estimated response

$0.1333 / 1M tokens

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

Compare published endpoint pricing and estimated response time visually.

Effective price by endpoint

USD per 1 million tokens for input and output. Lower is better.

Poolside has the lowest estimated cost for 1,000 input and 500 output tokens at $0.0002.

Estimated cost vs. response time

Based on 1,000 input and 500 output tokens. Cost is shown in USD per 1 million tokens. Lower and further left is better; the single best cost/speed trade-off appears at full opacity.

1 provider has complete pricing and speed data. Poolside is closest to the ideal combination of lowest cost and fastest response.

Server-rendered comparison

Provider endpoints

Prompt and completion prices are effective USD per token as published by OpenRouter. Missing speed data never removes an endpoint.

Endpoint comparison for Poolside: Laguna S 2.1
Provider / routePricing ↗BenchmarksAPI support
Provider / route
poolside/bf16
1M contextbf16131.1K max output
CheapestFastestBest cost/speed trade-off
Pricing
Input
$0.1 / 1M
Output
$0.2 / 1M
Cache
$0.01 / 1M
Blended
$0.1333 / 1M
Benchmarks
Speed
7.55 s
TTFT
0.51 s
TPS
71.0 tok/s
Uptime
100.00%
API support
  • Tool calling
  • Tool choice
  • Structured output
  • Parallel calls
7 parameters

include_reasoning, max_tokens, reasoning, stop, temperature, tool_choice, tools

Endpoint data fetched .

Laguna S 2.1 deployment guide

How to choose a Laguna S 2.1 inference provider

Laguna S 2.1 is indexed here as a text model by Poolside, with 1 provider endpoint from Poolside. The comparison preserves each exact OpenRouter routing tag so pricing and performance observations can be connected to the route an application would actually request.

Match the endpoint to the workload

The model publishes a 1M-token context window. It accepts text input and returns text output. 7 distinct supported parameters appear across the listed routes. Confirm limits on the specific endpoint rather than assuming every host exposes the same configuration.

Compare the real request economics

Poolside currently has the lowest estimated cost for the standard 1,000-input/500-output-token sample at $0.0002. Input-heavy and output-heavy applications can produce a different result, so review both per-million-token prices in the endpoint table.

Balance response start and generation speed

Poolside currently has the shortest estimated 500-token response at 7.55 seconds. Poolside is the single endpoint closest to the current ideal cost/speed combination. Recent observations can change, so validate finalists with your own prompts.