Best cost/speed trade-off
Ionstream
ionstream/fp8$0.34 / 1M tokens
9.93 s estimated response
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next provider comparison
qwen/qwen3-coder-next
Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open-weight causal language model optimized for coding agents and local development workflows. It uses a sparse MoE design with 80B total parameters and only 3B activated per...
- Endpoints:
- 5
- Context:
- 262.1K
- Input:
- text
- Output:
- text
At a glance
Comparison winners
Based on 1,000 input and 500 output tokens using the latest published median speed data.
Visual comparison
Price and performance charts
Compare published endpoint pricing and estimated response time visually.
USD per 1 million tokens for input and output. Lower is better.
Ionstream has the lowest estimated cost for 1,000 input and 500 output tokens at $0.00051.
Based on 1,000 input and 500 output tokens. Cost is shown in USD per 1 million tokens. Lower and further left is better; the single best cost/speed trade-off appears at full opacity.
5 providers have complete pricing and speed data. Ionstream is closest to the ideal combination of lowest cost and fastest response.
Server-rendered comparison
Provider endpoints
Prompt and completion prices are effective USD per token as published by OpenRouter. Missing speed data never removes an endpoint.
Rank providers by
| Provider / route | Current pricing ↗ | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider / route | Current pricing
| Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
13 parametersfrequency_penalty, logprobs, max_tokens, presence_penalty, response_format, seed, stop, structured_outputs, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_logprobs, top_p |
| Provider / route Parasail parasail/bf16 | Current pricing
| Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
16 parametersfrequency_penalty, logit_bias, logprobs, max_tokens, presence_penalty, repetition_penalty, response_format, seed, stop, structured_outputs, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_k, top_logprobs, top_p |
| Provider / route StreamLake streamlake | Current pricing
| Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
9 parametersfrequency_penalty, max_tokens, presence_penalty, response_format, stop, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_p |
| Provider / route NovitaAI novita/fp8 | Current pricing
| Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
12 parametersfrequency_penalty, max_tokens, presence_penalty, repetition_penalty, response_format, seed, stop, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_k, top_p |
| Provider / route Alibaba Cloud Int. alibaba | Current pricing
| Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
8 parametersmax_tokens, presence_penalty, response_format, seed, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_p |
Endpoint data fetched .
Qwen3 Coder Next deployment guide
How to choose a Qwen3 Coder Next inference provider
Qwen3 Coder Next is indexed here as a text model by Qwen, with 5 provider endpoints from Ionstream, Parasail, StreamLake, NovitaAI, Alibaba Cloud Int.. The comparison preserves each exact OpenRouter routing tag so pricing and performance observations can be connected to the route an application would actually request.
Match the endpoint to the workload
The model publishes a 262.1K-token context window. It accepts text input and returns text output. 16 distinct supported parameters appear across the listed routes. Confirm limits on the specific endpoint rather than assuming every host exposes the same configuration.
Compare the real request economics
Ionstream currently has the lowest estimated cost for the standard 1,000-input/500-output-token sample at $0.00051. Input-heavy and output-heavy applications can produce a different result, so review both per-million-token prices in the endpoint table.
Balance response start and generation speed
Ionstream currently has the shortest estimated 500-token response at 9.93 seconds. Ionstream is the single endpoint closest to the current ideal cost/speed combination. Recent observations can change, so validate finalists with your own prompts.