Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by their recent typical output speed in tokens per second. Providers without enough recent data remain visible after ranked rows.
Ionstream currently ranks first at 53.0 tok/s via ionstream/fp8.
| Rank | Provider / route | Output speed | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route Ionstream ionstream/fp8 | Output speed53.0 tok/s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route Parasail parasail/bf16 | Output speed52.5 tok/s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route StreamLake streamlake | Output speed42.0 tok/s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #4 | Provider / route Alibaba Cloud Int. alibaba | Output speed39.0 tok/s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #5 | Provider / route NovitaAI novita/fp8 | Output speed14.0 tok/s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Qwen3 Coder Next endpoint guide
5 of 5 Qwen3 Coder Next endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. Ionstream leads at 53.0 tok/s via ionstream/fp8. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The output-speed ranking compares recent median generated tokens per second. It favors routes that complete long generations quickly, while first-token latency remains a separate measure of how responsive the endpoint feels at the beginning.
Parasail currently ranks second at 52.5 tok/s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Qwen3 Coder Next has 5 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
