Crusoe vs Nebius: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CCrusoe

3.77× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

NNebius

$0.7683 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

NNebius

13 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	NNebius☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Crusoe11.96 s	Nebius22.20 s
TTFT	Crusoe0.39 s	Nebius0.62 s
TPS	Crusoe43.0 tok/s	Nebius23.0 tok/s
Uptime	Crusoe99.74%	Nebius98.69%
Blended	Crusoe$0.7992 / 1M	Nebius$0.7683 / 1M

Model	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	NNebius☆☆☆☆☆(0)
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 5.89 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 91.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 202.8K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.2667 / 1M	Nebius Speed— Worst comparable value 22.20 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.46 s TPS— Worst comparable value 23.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.32% Context 202.8K Route nebius/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.4 / 1M
N Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B	Crusoe Speed N/a TTFT N/a TPS N/a Uptime— Worst comparable value 0.00% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.1 / 1M	Nebius Speed 10.63 s TTFT 0.42 s TPS 49.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.67% Context 262.1K Route nebius/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.12 / 1M
Q Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner · Nebius	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 11.96 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.33 s TPS— Best comparable value 43.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.58% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4133 / 1M	Nebius Speed— Worst comparable value 14.14 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.62 s TPS— Worst comparable value 37.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 98.06% Context 262.1K Route nebius/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.3333 / 1M
ML Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 14.59 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.70 s TPS— Best comparable value 36.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.91% Context 131.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4167 / 1M	Nebius Speed— Worst comparable value 56.19 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.63 s TPS— Worst comparable value 9.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 62.64% Context 131.1K Route nebius/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.22 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.