Chutes vs Crusoe: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CChutes

1.45× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

CChutes

$1.1633 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

CChutes

9 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CChutes☆☆☆☆☆(0)	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Chutes20.51 s	Crusoe34.64 s
TTFT	Chutes2.46 s	Crusoe0.83 s
TPS	Chutes29.0 tok/s	Crusoe15.0 tok/s
Uptime	Chutes61.78%	Crusoe91.12%
Blended	Chutes$1.1633 / 1M	Crusoe$1.3756 / 1M

Model	CChutes☆☆☆☆☆(0)	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)
M Kimi K2.6Winner · Chutes	Chutes Speed— Best comparable value 13.07 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.17 s TPS— Best comparable value 42.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.27% Context 262.1K Route chutes/int4 Blended— Best comparable value $1.6067 / 1M	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 34.64 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.31 s TPS— Worst comparable value 15.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 56.00% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.6333 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · Crusoe	Chutes Speed— Worst comparable value 20.51 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 3.27 s TPS— Worst comparable value 29.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 28.70% Context 202.8K Route chutes/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $1.68 / 1M	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 5.89 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 91.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 202.8K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.2667 / 1M
G Gemma 4 31BWinner · Chutes	Chutes Speed— Best comparable value 58.02 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.46 s TPS— Best comparable value 9.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 61.78% Context 131.1K Route chutes/fp4 Blended— Best comparable value $0.2033 / 1M	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 84.17 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.83 s TPS— Worst comparable value 6.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 91.12% Context 262.1K Route crusoe Blended— Worst comparable value $0.2267 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.